The consultationing of eyewitness is a very sensitive process that view to be carried out with c ar and logic if it is to bring home the bacon in its aims. However, it has been shown that the reposition is fallible and can fail when it comes to refunding stored study in that it recalls false information about events that didnt really happen. This thence poses a problem when eyewitnesses are interviewed as they can a great deal recall information that is false and because delay the investigation. bartlett adduce that memories are reconstructions in accordance with a schema and that they are not videos. Loftus also made similar findings to this; he utter that the storage is influenced by the questions asked as memories are reconstructions. This therefore shows that in order to improve the random nature of interviews the supra mental principles need to be applied. In light of this, Tulving and Thompson (1973) investigated the encode specificity principle. They fix th at due to memories being encoded, stored and the retrieved it is easier to retrieve a storehouse when you are in the same delirious or somatogenic state as when you encoded it.
Therefore, in a cognitive interview enquire the interviewee to re ?create mentally the physical and emotional dorsumground of the incident may jog their memory and so they volition be able to give a more realised description of what happened. Police may also take them underpin to the scene of the crime and try and reconstruct the incident in a Crimewatch style to see if this sets off any memory triggers. Loftus and Collins (1975) also came up with a model that by chance a! pplied to interviewing techniques. The spreading activation model shows that concepts in the colossal term memory are linked semantically i.e. by means of semantic nets. Therefore to improve the interviewing techniques... If you expect to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment